After helping tens of thousands of social workers prepare for their licensing exams since 2009, we've seen the same study mistakes derail otherwise well-prepared candidates. The frustrating part? Most people making these mistakes are working hard and studying consistently. They're not lacking effort—they're lacking strategy.
Here are the five mistakes that keep showing up, and more importantly, what to do instead.
Here's how this mistake looks: You sit down with a practice exam, work through 50 or 100 questions, check your score, feel good if you got 75% or discouraged if you got 65%, then move on to the next practice test.
You're using practice questions to measure yourself, not to teach yourself.
The actual learning happens in the review, not in the initial attempt. When you get a question wrong, that's not a failure—it's showing you exactly where your understanding breaks down. When you get a question right, the explanation tells you whether you got it right for the right reasons or just got lucky.
The fix: Treat every practice question as a teaching moment. When you review:
The goal isn't to complete as many practice questions as possible. The goal is to extract maximum learning from each question you do. Fifty questions thoroughly reviewed will serve you better than 200 questions rushed through.
You spend hours reviewing theories, memorizing DSM criteria, and reading about intervention techniques. You can explain cognitive-behavioral therapy, describe the stages of group development, and list the symptoms of major depression. Then you sit down with practice questions and can't figure out what they're asking for.
This happens because the ASWB exam doesn't test whether you know information—it tests whether you can use information to make clinical decisions.
The fix: Change how you study content. Instead of just learning what something is, practice applying it:
When you study a theory, don't just summarize it. Create scenarios: "If I had a client presenting with X, how would this theory explain what's happening? What would it suggest I do?" When you review an intervention technique, ask: "What would make me choose this over alternatives? What would this look like in the first session versus later treatment?"
Better yet, work backward from practice questions. When you miss a question about solution-focused therapy, don't just review solution-focused therapy in general. Review it specifically in the context of that question: Why was it the right choice there? When would it not be the right choice?
This is harder than passive reading, which is exactly why it works better. You're building the kind of thinking the exam is testing.
You know you struggle with psychopharmacology, so you focus your study time on clinical assessment, where you feel more confident. Or you're uncomfortable with questions about community practice, so you spend extra time on individual therapy scenarios where you're stronger.
This is human nature. Studying things you're already good at feels productive and builds confidence. Studying things you don't understand feels frustrating and inefficient.
But here's the problem: the exam doesn't let you skip entire content areas. Those psychopharmacology questions and community practice scenarios will be there whether you studied them or not. Every question you're not prepared for is a point you're leaving on the table.
The fix: Identify your weak areas early and deliberately, then front-load them in your study schedule.
Take a diagnostic practice test in your first week of studying. Note which content areas generated the most wrong answers. Those areas become your priority, not something you'll "get to eventually." Schedule them for when your brain is freshest—usually earlier in study sessions or earlier in the day.
For content that feels particularly opaque, don't just read about it. Find different resources. Sometimes a different author's explanation clicks when the first one didn't. Watch videos, use mnemonics, create comparison charts—whatever helps the information stick.
The goal is to get your weak areas up to adequate before test day. You don't need to become an expert in pharmacology, but you do need to answer basic questions about it correctly. That's a manageable goal if you face it head-on instead of avoiding it.
You spend Monday studying crisis intervention, Tuesday on assessment tools, Wednesday on ethical decision-making, and Thursday on developmental theory. You're organized and systematic. You're covering all the content areas.
But the ASWB exam doesn't organize questions by topic. In the actual test, a crisis intervention question is followed by an ethics question, then a child development question, then a community practice scenario. You need to be able to switch contexts rapidly and pull from different knowledge areas without warning.
The fix: Once you've done initial content review, study the way you'll be tested—with mixed topics.
Use full-length practice exams or randomized question sets that jump between content areas. This does two things: it trains your brain to shift gears quickly, and it helps you integrate knowledge instead of keeping it siloed.
Pay special attention to questions that require you to pull from multiple content areas. "A 16-year-old client who is questioning her gender identity is brought to therapy by her parents who oppose her transition" isn't just an adolescent development question or just an ethics question or just a family therapy question—it's all of those at once. The exam loves these integrative scenarios because they reflect actual practice.
You study with your phone nearby, pausing to check messages. You work through questions for 30 minutes, take a break, come back for another 20 minutes. You review content while half-watching TV. You take practice tests untimed or stop when you get tired.
Then on exam day, you sit down for a 4-hour test requiring sustained focus and find that your brain isn't conditioned for it. The endurance, the pressure, the inability to take breaks whenever you want—it's all unfamiliar and draining.
The fix: Build test-taking stamina deliberately, starting several weeks before your exam.
Take at least two full-length practice exams under actual test conditions: four hours, no phone, no breaks except the optional one allowed mid-test, timed to match the real thing. Do this even though it's uncomfortable. Especially because it's uncomfortable.
You'll discover things in these simulations that you can't learn any other way. Maybe your concentration drops after two hours and you need to work on stamina. Maybe you rush through questions when you're watching the clock and need to practice pacing. Maybe you second-guess yourself and need to build confidence in your first instincts.
These aren't personality flaws—they're test-taking habits you can observe and adjust. But only if you practice under real conditions first.
Also pay attention to the physical experience. Four hours is a long time to sit. When do you start feeling mentally fatigued? When do you need to stand up and stretch during your optional break? What time of day works best for your focus? These logistics matter more than you'd think.
Here's the underlying issue connecting all these mistakes: when people feel unprepared, they usually respond by adding more study hours. They figure if 10 hours a week isn't working, maybe 15 will. If one month wasn't enough, maybe two will be.
Sometimes that's true. But often, the problem isn't quantity—it's approach. You can study inefficiently for three months and still not be ready, or you can study strategically for six weeks and pass confidently.
Before you add more hours to your study schedule, honestly assess whether you're making these five mistakes. If you are, fixing your approach will likely do more for your score than doubling your study time while continuing to use ineffective methods.
The ASWB exam is passable. It's testing competence, not perfection. You don't need to be exceptional at everything—you need to be adequately prepared across all content areas and practiced at demonstrating that preparation under test conditions.
That's achievable, but it requires studying like someone who's preparing to pass an exam, not like someone who's reading textbooks in grad school. These are different skills, and the differences matter.
Right now, get SWTP's online practice exams at a reduced price. Just $39. Get additional savings when buying more than one exam at a time-- less than $30 per exam!
Keep going till you pass. Extensions are free.
To receive our free study guide and get started!