You're 45 minutes into your ASWB exam when it happens. That nagging feeling pulls you back to question 23. Your finger hovers over the mouse. Should I change it?
Most students tell us they've heard the old test-taking wisdom: "Your first instinct is usually right—don't second-guess yourself." But what that advice misses is crucial: the ASWB isn't testing your instincts. It's testing your clinical reasoning, and reasoning improves when you think more deeply about a question.
The real question isn't whether to change answers. It's when changing makes you more accurate versus when it's just anxiety talking.
Studies on multiple-choice testing consistently find that answer changes improve scores more often than they hurt them. Researchers analyzing thousands of answer changes found students changed from wrong to right about twice as often as they changed from right to wrong.
There's a catch, though. Not all answer changes are created equal.
The changes that help? You spot information in the question stem you initially missed. You realize you misread a qualifier like FIRST or BEST. Additional thinking reveals why one option fits the scenario better than another—and you can explain exactly why.
The changes that hurt? Anxiety makes every answer look wrong. You're changing based purely on "this feels different." You've already changed the same answer multiple times, spinning in circles.
The "trust your first instinct" rule doesn't apply cleanly to the ASWB, and there's a specific reason why: about 70% of the questions require application or reasoning—not simple recall. You're not just remembering that cognitive behavioral therapy uses thought records. You're deciding whether CBT is the BEST intervention for a specific client in a specific situation with specific cultural considerations.
That kind of thinking benefits from reflection.
Consider a vignette about a client experiencing domestic violence who's resistant to leaving. Your initial reaction might focus on safety planning. But after answering 20 more questions, you come back to it and notice something: the question asked what to do FIRST. Suddenly "validate the client's feelings and assess readiness for change" makes more sense than immediately developing a safety plan.
Your clinical judgment just improved. That's not second-guessing—that's thinking.
Some answer changes improve your score. Others tank it. Learning to tell the difference matters more than following any blanket rule about changing or not changing.
The word FIRST, BEST, NEXT, or MOST isn't decorative. It's the entire point of the question. If you answered based on what's eventually appropriate but missed that the question asked for the first action, change it. In SWTP's practice tests, we see this pattern repeatedly—students who slow down and reread qualifiers during their review pass improve their accuracy by 8-12 points on average.
Maybe the client's age suddenly matters. Maybe you missed that the question specified "without obtaining consent" or "during the initial session." These aren't trivial details—they change which answer is correct. If rereading reveals details that change your clinical reasoning, trust that discovery.
Try this right now: Pull up your last practice test. Find a question you got wrong. How many times does the question stem contain information you didn't fully process the first time? Most students find at least 3-4 questions where missed details led them astray.
Questions that specify "Using a strengths-based approach" or "According to crisis intervention theory" aren't suggestions—they're instructions. If your initial answer addressed the problem from a deficit perspective when the question explicitly asked for strengths-based practice, change it. You didn't answer the question that was asked, no matter how clinically sound your reasoning might be.
Not a vague feeling. A reason. "Answer B focuses on assessment, and assessment always comes before intervention" is a reason. "Answer C just feels more right" is not. "Answer D addresses the FIRST step while my original answer skips to a later intervention" is a reason. "I've been picking A a lot and that seems weird" is not.
The distinction matters. Changes based on reasoning improve scores. Changes based on feelings don't.
Your thought process sounds like this: "This answer looks too obvious." "I feel like I'm choosing A too much." "This just seems wrong now." Stop right there. Those aren't clinical reasons—that's test anxiety, and test anxiety doesn't improve your score.
We've seen students in SWTP's practice exams talk themselves out of correct answers because they worried about picking too many of the same letter in a row. One student changed eight correct answers during the review period because "there were too many Bs." She dropped 8 points.
The ASWB doesn't create patterns in answer distribution to trick you. Random distribution means runs of the same letter happen naturally. Question 45 through 49 could all legitimately be C. That's just probability, not a sign you're doing something wrong.
Coming back to the same question for the third time? You're spinning. The ASWB testing software lets you flag questions for review, and that feature is valuable—but it's not an invitation to overthink every answer into the ground.
Pick the answer that best fits the question as written. Flag it if you're uncertain. Keep moving. If you find yourself drawn back to it a second time, that's your signal to leave it alone and trust the reasoning you applied the first time.
If you're tempted to change but can't articulate what makes the new answer superior, don't change. "I don't know, it just seems better" is your brain trying to reduce discomfort, not improve accuracy.
One student told us she tracked this for three practice exams. Every time she changed an answer without being able to write down a specific reason why, the change hurt her score. Every single time. Once she implemented a rule—"I can only change if I can write down why in one clear sentence"—her score jumped 11 points.
Students who score consistently well tend to use some version of this approach, whether they realize it or not.
First pass: Move through the exam answering every question. Flag the ones where you're genuinely uncertain—not anxious, but uncertain because the question requires more thought. Don't flag more than 20-25 questions, or you'll overwhelm yourself during review.
Second pass: Review only the flagged questions. For each one, ask: "Do I have new information or insight that changes my answer?" If yes, change it. If no, leave it alone.
This strategy prevents the endless rumination that wastes time and increases anxiety. You're using the second pass purposefully, not as an opportunity to doubt everything you did the first pass. The flagging feature in SWTP's practice exams mimics exactly what you'll see on test day, so you can build this habit now rather than figuring it out when it counts.
The students who struggle most with answer-changing tend to review everything during the second pass, opening themselves up to hundreds of opportunities to second-guess. Don't do that. Be selective about what you flag.
After each practice exam, review not just what you got wrong, but specifically what you changed. This is where you learn your personal patterns—and everyone's different.
Create three categories:
Look for patterns in your behavior. Are you changing because you're catching qualifiers you missed? Good—keep doing that. Are you changing because answers "feel" different the second time? That's a habit to break.
A student working through SWTP's practice exams discovered she changed answers most often on questions about ethics and boundaries—and those changes usually hurt her score. Why? Ethics questions made her anxious, and anxiety made her doubt her knowledge. Once she recognized the pattern, she learned to trust her initial reasoning on ethics questions unless she spotted a specific error in her thinking. Her ethics subsection score improved by 15%.
That's the kind of self-awareness that changes outcomes.
Here's a question where changing your answer might help—or might hurt, depending on your reasoning:
A social worker meets with a client who reports feeling anxious about an upcoming court hearing related to child custody. The client becomes tearful and says, "I don't know if I can do this." What should the social worker do FIRST?
A. Refer the client to an attorney
B. Explore the client's specific concerns about the hearing
C. Teach the client relaxation techniques
D. Assess the client's mental health history
You picked C initially—the client is anxious, and relaxation techniques address anxiety. Makes sense.
But you come back to it during your review pass. Now you notice two things you glazed over: the word FIRST, and the fact that the client just made a vague statement without explaining what specific concerns are driving the anxiety.
Good reason to change: "I need to explore what's actually causing the anxiety before I intervene. Assessment comes before intervention. The answer is B."
Bad reason to change: "I don't know, maybe D? Mental health history seems important. Or wait, maybe A because attorneys are involved? I've been picking C a lot today..."
See the difference? One involves clinical reasoning. The other is just noise.
The correct answer is B—you'd explore the specific concerns before moving to any intervention. If you changed from C to B because you caught the word FIRST and recognized you needed to assess before intervening, that's a change that helps. If you changed to D because you're spinning and everything looks wrong, that's a change that hurts.
The ASWB exam runs four hours. By question 140, you're tired. Your blood sugar might be low. Your back hurts from sitting. That's exactly when answer-changing becomes most dangerous, because fatigue makes it harder to distinguish between "I just noticed something important" and "everything looks wrong now."
Students who score well don't follow rigid rules about never changing answers or always trusting their gut. They know their patterns. They know whether they tend to overthink and talk themselves out of correct answers, or whether they tend to rush and benefit from reflection. They know which content areas make them anxious and trigger unproductive answer changes.
You learn your patterns through practice. Take full-length practice exams under timed conditions. Track your answer changes. Build awareness of when your revisions improve accuracy and when they're just anxiety in disguise. That awareness is worth more than any generic test-taking tip.
Before your next practice session, decide on a clear strategy for answer changes. Will you make two passes through the exam? Will you limit yourself to one change per question? Will you write down your reasoning for any answer you change?
Having a plan reduces the mental energy you'll spend debating whether to change answers. That energy is better spent on clinical reasoning.
Most importantly: practice your strategy before test day. You can't build this skill by reading about it. You build it by taking realistic practice exams, tracking your answer changes, noticing your patterns, and learning whether your instincts serve you well or lead you astray.
Start a full-length practice test today. The practice test experience should replicate actual exam conditions—including the ability to flag questions, change answers, and review your choices. That's where you'll discover whether changing answers helps or hurts your specific performance. Track every change you make, note whether it helped or hurt, and look for patterns in your decision-making. That data is more valuable than any blanket rule about answer-changing could ever be.
Right now, get SWTP's online practice exams at a reduced price. Just $39. Get additional savings when buying more than one exam at a time-- less than $30 per exam!
Keep going till you pass. Extensions are free.
To receive our free study guide and get started!